Why you don’t have to fix every vulnerability
Image by Thinkstock
The word “vulnerability” typically comes with a “must fix now” response. However, not all vulnerabilities should be treated equally because not all of them pose a risk. It all depends on what the data represents. In fact, some vulnerabilities are OK to deprioritize, depending on associated threats and the value of the asset at risk. For example, a lock on a 20th floor window of a building is not as important as one on the ground level, unless the contents of the room are so valuable that a thief would take the effort to access such an unreachable place. Scans reveal thousands of vulnerabilities across all assets – networks, applications, systems and devices – but they do not show which ones could lead to a damaging compromise if not fixed immediately. It is not about ignoring vulnerabilities; it is about prioritizing how you apply your resources to remediate them. Bay Dynamics provides some examples of vulnerabilities that are OK to put on the back burner.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
Read more: Why you don’t have to fix every vulnerability
More antivirus and malware news?
- Second LulzSec hacker, Raynaldo Rivera, also surrenders
- Intel offers rewards to anyone who can bring in women and minorities
- IBM to License ARM Designs for Networking, Communications Chips
- Hacker Lexicon: What Are White Hat, Gray Hat, and Black Hat Hackers?
- In-the-Wild Exploitation of Fresh Fortinet Flaws Begins
- Adblocking and browser privacy can be bypassed, researchers find
- Cybereason Unveils New Mobile Device Security Offerings
- Convicted SpyEye virus creator gets 9 years in prison
- Multiple Dell Products DSA-2019-164 Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
- Old Kerberos Bypass Flaw Patched in Windows, Linux