Court rejects LinkedIn claim that unauthorized scraping is hacking

https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/16525600739_6915413359_k-800x533.jpg

A California federal court has handed a setback to LinkedIn in a case that could determine whether scraping a public website triggers anti-hacking law. The 25-page ruling, released on Monday, holds that federal anti-hacking law isn’t triggered by scraping a website, even if the website owner—LinkedIn in this case—explicitly asks for the scraping to stop.

Tags: 

Read more: Court rejects LinkedIn claim that unauthorized scraping is hacking

Story added 16. August 2017, content source with full text you can find at link above.