Blockchain Technology Abuse: Time to Think About Fixes
Kaspersky Lab and INTERPOL recently presented research on how blockchain-based cryptocurrencies could be abused through the pollution of public decentralized databases with arbitrary data. During our presentation at the BlackHat Asia conference in Singapore, we demonstrated the proof-of-concept using the Bitcoin network, but it’s important to understand that any cryptocurrency that relies on blockchain technology can be abused in this way.
Blockchain-based cryptocurrencies could be abused through the pollution of p2p databases with arbitrary data
Some believe that security researchers, especially those from the anti-malware industry, generally only publish threat reports after the discovery of a threat in the wild. However, this is not always true. Our current research focuses on potential future threats that could be prevented before cryptocurrencies are fully adopted and standardized. While we generally support the idea of blockchain-based innovations, we think that, as part of the security community, it is our duty to help developers make such technologies fit-for-purpose and sustainable.
Blockchainware, short for blockchain-based software, stores some of its executable code in the decentralized databases of cryptocurrency transactions. It is based on the idea of establishing a connection to the P2P networks of cryptocurrency enthusiasts, fetching information from transaction records and running it as code. Depending on the payload fetched from the network, it can be either benign or malicious.
The proof-of-concept code we demonstrated was a benign piece of software
To ensure the accurate interpretation of our research, we would like to point out that in the anti-malware industry, there is a clear definition of what constitutes malware, and there are extremely strict policies in place that forbid any attempts to create or distribute malware. The proof-of-concept code we demonstrated was a benign piece of software that opened the Notepad application after getting a confirmation from the user.
So, what exactly did we demonstrate at BlackHat Asia? See for yourself at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNsqXHbeMco
As we pointed out during our presentation, possible solutions can be introduced at different layers. From the perspective of a company developing endpoint security solutions, we don’t believe it’s too much trouble to blacklist applications that load unpredictable external payload from a P2P network.
We believe that the value of solution development lies in its neutrality and decentralized decision-making
However, from the perspective of the cryptocurrency network, it’s still an open question. We are not the experts in this field, and are therefore not best placed to propose effective solutions. We also don’t want to promote any specific solution as we believe that the value of solution development (as in the case of Bitcoin) lies in its neutrality and decentralized decision-making.
That’s why we suggest this is a project for the cryptocurrency community.
We don't promote any specific solution. We suggest this is a project for the cryptocurrency community
As a starting point for opening a discussion in the community, we suggest looking for an opportunity to implement a network consensus/negotiation algorithm that will sustain the clean state of the blockchain.